&
Advertise Here with Today.com
 

Jan 06 2009

Is 2009 the Year of the Geek?

Published by dreadpiraterose at 3:05 pm under Convention Related Edit This

I came across two great blog entries from writer Elisabeth Rappe of Cinematical.com. The first entry is a list of all upcoming “Geek Movies” for 2009. Looking at the list now, it does seem like 2009 could be the Year of the Geek. Not only will there be a new X-Men movie, but Star Trek finally makes its way back to the silver screen. We may or may not get to see Watchman, which all depends on how Fox’s litigation goes (seriously Fox, could you possibly treat fans any worse? Yes, I am still pissed about Firefly.). Then there’s the Dragonball Z movie (not really high hopes for this one), and of course, there’s a new Harry Potter movie this year (if you haven’t started your costume for the premier - get on it!).

Yes, it looks like a damn good year to be a geek.

Elizabeth’s second blog entry is about defining the “Geek Genre.” There is no doubt that the term “geek” has been evolving in my life time. Who would of thought there’d ever be such a thing as “geek chic” after all? Elizabeth’s argument is that a “geek genre” has emerged because of the Internet, NOT the popularity and prevalence of the geeky movies. Bravo Elizabeth! I agree with you entirely.

The Internet has given a new life to all things geeky, and created a new found accessibility, all the while allowing for the mobilization and organization of fandoms all over the globe.  Without the Internet, I really think a lot of fans would have stayed isolated and alone in their love of Star Trek, Star Wars, D&D, or whatever the case may be.

Be sure to check out Elizabeth’s articles. I know I’ll be adding her blog to my favorites list.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz
Advertise Here with Today.com

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here
Some Today.com contributors may have received a fee or a promotional product or service from a manufacturer for promotional consideration, while others receive no consideration at all. Each contributor is responsible for disclosing any such promotional consideration.